**Please Note: I have taken the rough ideas from this blog and expanded them into a short book which you can download for free by clicking here.
The Rational Male just posted a fantastic essay that really got me thinking. As is commonly discussed on the manosphere, women reach their sexual market peak in their early 20’s while men don’t reach theirs until their mid to late 30’s. Rollo did a bang-up job of plotting this data on a chart so we can clearly see what this looks like:
SMV Curve, courtesy of Rational Male
There’s a lot to be gleaned from this seemingly simple chart, but there is one connection in particular that I would like to draw your attention to. As the feminists have pounded into our heads over and over again a woman’s 20’s are for experimentation and fun, not to be wasted by settling down and committing to one man; and as you can see from the chart this period coincides precisely with a woman’s peak sexual market value.
Up until about age 30 women have a clear and massive advantage over the men their age in the dating field. But after that point the tables turn 180° almost instantaneously. Suddenly the men have the upper hand and the women are scrambling to find a seat before the music stops.
As I pondered this turn of events it occurred to me that all of these man-shaming articles we’re always seeing are aimed directly at men from their mid 20’s to late 30’s. That’s exactly smack dab in the middle of a man’s meteoric rise to sexual market heights, and I don’t think the timing is coincidental:
Yes, men should man up, take on the responsibilities of an adult, get a job, have a family and be a contributing member to society.
<snip>
[Men] can make choices to take control of their lives and be the men they are called to be if they just put down the game controls and choose a better direction. Sadly, at the moment, American women are apparently still in need of a few good men.
In times past the older generations would steer young women into marriage to a man with potential. Sure, in a young woman’s eyes it might look like she was settling for less than the ideal, but the older generations knew that a woman’s market value was fleeting while a man’s market value would continue growing for years to come. The time for a woman to land one of these up-and-comers was while her value was high and his was comparatively low. The man benefited early on by having a beautiful, fertile bride and she benefited later by having a man who was working steadily to provide a comfortable life for herself and their children.What our current system is effectively doing is telling women that they are entitled to spend their years of high market value slutting it up and trying to land that elusive alpha male, and then turning around and telling men that they should be sacrificing their high market value years to create a soft landing for these women who have now (by necessity) decided to step off of the carousal and into the open arms of a waiting beta provider.
But what’s happening is that men are starting to recognize their own market potential. Most have spent a decade or more begging for scraps but are now finally coming into their own as a powerhouse of masculinity ready to divide and conquer. Why would they or should they “man up” and set about providing for these women in decline just as their own sexual market value is providing them their turn to ride high on the hog?
As usual what it comes down to is that the feminists think that women should have their cake and eat it, too. Sure, they couch it in pretty language by saying that these women have matured and are ready to settle down, but the numbers don’t lie. These women have squandered their few precious years of beauty and fertility on cad after cad and now they want a beta male coming into his prime to do what they would not – give up his SMV advantage in the interests of a committed monogamous relationship. That’s what this whole “manning up” movement is really all about. The fact that this generation of men is insisting on their fair share of the equality that the sexual revolution has wrought chaps these ladies’ hides.
The last few decades have been pretty generous to women who wanted to ride the carousel and still settle down with a beta provider later on as the men were still adjusting to the new system. But as today’s men wake up to their own sexual market value and realize that there isn’t a whole lot of incentive to “man up” and marry a woman who is past her prime when he could be out playing the field with the younger gals, the full picture of what the sexual revolution means for Western Civilization is coming into focus. And the women who played their cards foolishly don’t like this new hand they’ve been dealt one bit.
Pingback: Final Exam – Navigating the SMP «
This was a great read. I don’t feel quite so angry now.
I have always been fairly low on the dating totem pole, until the past couple years. (34-35 range.) All of a sudden I am at least mid level or above. It happened out of no where when I “gave up” so to speak. I cannot say I am rolling in women, but I am able to land a high 8 or 9 every now and then.
The thing about swallowing the red pill is that it takes a long time to digest. I’m almost a year into being “game-aware” and I’m just beginning to recognize my SMV at age 29. I used to worry that if I wasn’t married or at least in an LTR by 30 I was failing, not so. I’m not even really interested in monogamous LTRs right now since I know I can continue to attract hot and desirable women for years to come.
I feel as young as ever while I can clearly see women aging before my eyes. Why would I make a lifelong commitment to a woman who’s 30 (even a hottie) when she’s already a decade out of her prime and her looks will fade by 40 at the latest?
It was frustrating as hell in college, being in Beta/LTR mode while the attractive women had no desire for commitment. Now that I’m just hitting my stride it’d be crazy to “settle down”. While most people I know shackle themselves into unsatisfying LTRs and marriages because they’re “supposed to”, I’ll be enjoying my freedom. Perhaps the day for marriage will come, but it’ll be on my terms, not because of societal coercion.
@nick
” Now that I’m just hitting my stride it’d be crazy to “settle down”. ”
It’s interesting how similar this is to the girls’ attitude when they are 20.
So, so true. And the irony, oh the irony, of the fact that they are able to shame us for this attitude with ideas like “man up” and “stop trying to be Peter Pan”, but articles that shame women for their early 20s behavior? Forget it. Even if they get written, the feminist cavalry comes by and destroys the comments section with utter nonsense. You can have your cake and eat it too, women, but we can’t?
Oh wait, we totally can *sly grin*
“Men don’t reach theirs until their mid to late 30′”
I knew it! Middle-aged bald guys are freakin hawt
that’s a great logical fallacy you got there. Cuz all men in their mid thirties are bald …dumbass
Man26’s comment also assumes that baldness of any type can’t be worked with. Nowadays a dude can just shave his whole head without people thinking he’s some white supremacist.
Cry me a river, baldie.
and all women in their thirties look old….
dumbarse
As an ageing man you can go up to a young woman and tell her: “you’re a waning asset, I’m a rising asset”.
Loves me some pert young ones and so do you.
Pedo bear is coming for you
Oh, I did hear the first 40 years of childhood are the hardest…
You know, part of the whole “being treated equal” lullaby is to stop using double standards. Society expects one who is able to provide for a family (men and women alike) to start a family. Both man and women usually have the same “path” in life – they start a career at either 18 or 20-something, build on it; try to get a car, get a place to live, get a life standard (which happens usually around the 30s, give or take some 3 years). No 25-year-old is partner in a law firm, has his own company or is branch manager unless he’s daddy’s girl or boy or unless he’s some sort of genious (there are few of those, and again, their succes starts earlier too, just because they can provide). As we all know, male heirs have a much earlier market value and it has nothing to do with their sexual peak. It’s economy that rules, not sexual peak.
If you feel that being 30 and available is your “market advantage”, you should indeed not reproduce…Darwin would be proud of you, and so will we: not only that you are a beta-male finally managing to impress just becase compared to a guy in his 20s, you can actually pay for the drinks, but you feel that settling down when you met someone you like would be a “sacrifice of your best years”.
Oh, and don’t you dare label me as a spitfull woman over 30: I had my peak in my 20s, loved it, in the meanwhile met my guy, settled down, love it too. Life is nice when you recognise not your “market value” and “right to take advantage of it” but what’s right under your nose, someone you enjoy spending most of your time with. If you’re ready to throw that out on the window because you have “a few good years left” and hence cannot be expected to “man up”, well…no loss for anyone there, except maybe for your mum and dad who actually wanted to see some grandchildren before they dies and seriously cannot be expected to live until you’re mature enough – say, for instance, in your 70s….
What’s priceless about your comment is it just proved what everyone is sayings… you lived it up in your prime 20’s, then settled down with a provider guy, and now you’re lecturing a guy for wanting to live it up in his prime… you rode the cock carousal yourself, but want to try to shame men into not living it up when they can hookup with women 23-30. Why shouldn’t he live it up in his prime, and then settle down with some girl when he’s 35 or so? It’s no different from what you did.
Haha. I’m not even gonna try to address the contradictory BS scattered throughout her comment. That hamster is spinning so fast right now that if I tried to touch it my hand would disintegrate!
hamster hand disintegration, the 2nd most common way to lose your hand to a BS filled woman
Who invented “sexual market value”? Roissy? RooshV?
Whoever it was, the bloke is a genius
Does this mean that if a woman gets married at 20-25, all she has to look forward to is her husband beginning to think of her as “past her prime” as the years go by, kind of like his car? Because guess what? The years are going to pass whether or not we’re married or single. Eventually you will be married to a 30-something! Oh, the horror! But you probably believe it’s fine to dump her for another youth; after all, she’s nothing but another possession to you and “love” has no place in your transactional equation. Have fun til you’re a dirty old man with three or four ex-trophy wives. Should be a real blast to die alone in a nursing home or on the street broke from alimony payments.
We wouldn’t get married to them in the first place. You’ve missed the essence of the article.
Well being that we can clearly demonstrate that women do not value men AT ALL beyond their potential as a utility. I see no reason why men should not value women beyond their fertility potential. I mean once a woman is past her prime she is really just dead weight. The only thing that really matters is the offspring and if women have no problem viewing men as disposable in the face of a Darwinistic mentality than why not the reverse.
It is clear at least to my mind that women have always been vastly more indifferent to the suffering/well being of men than men are to women. Meaning that if women do not possess any real degree of sentimentality then why should men. In fact why are women not simply discarded somewhere between the ages of 40-45.
Put simply, what would the world be like if men thought like women for just a short time. If such an amazingly simple/cold and ultimately moronic behavioral algorithm dictated our actions?
I think the idea is she would marry someone older so that her depreciation matches his. i.e. 21-24 year old marrying a 30-35 year old. When she is 30-33, he will be 39-44. Also we fault based divorce and alimony rules in the past that disincentivised this very behaviour you speak of.
Pingback: Despre Pilula Roșie care te scapă de feminism
This article made me smile so wide it honestly hurt abit, i now feel like a celebration is in order
Think of all women as stupid, fat, and ugly. Treat them like guys.
Eventually, one will become intrigued by the lack of fawning and slobbering. Unlike admiration, indifference and contempt are at least interesting reactions to a woman. They want to know why you don’t hand them the key to the club. Don’t crack. Ignore the physical as best you can, because you cannot win unless you do – nature has tricked you. Lift the veil of beauty, and the inner ugliness will be revealed. No matter how good she looks, someone is sick of her bullshit.
Truth!
For all men’s sake, I’d suggest everyone share this article with a few friends and tell them to do the same.
Pingback: A Course In Relationships | The Sound and The Fury